Document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report

https://cdn.kscope.io/dcb991d745e7a973bcf3150a9813a611-image_01a.jpg

Amkor Technology, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Delaware
000-29472
23-1722724
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(Commission
File Number)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)


2045 East Innovation Circle, Tempe, AZ
85284
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)


Mark N. Rogers
(480) 821-5000
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report)


Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:

[X] Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2020.










Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure

Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report

Conflict Minerals Disclosure

Amkor Technology, Inc. (“Amkor”) conducted a Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (RCOI) in 2020 on the source of its Conflict Minerals (tantalum, tin, tungsten, and gold) to determine whether the Conflict Minerals used when performing our semiconductor packaging services originated from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (the “Covered Countries”) or are from recycled or scrap sources.

We conducted our RCOI with our direct suppliers using the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT), a supply chain survey tool provided by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), an industry group that works to address Conflict Minerals issues within supply chains. The CMRT requests direct suppliers to identify the smelters, refiners, and countries of origin of the Conflict Minerals in their products. We relied primarily on responses received from our direct suppliers to identify sources of Conflict Minerals and information provided by the RMI.

Based on the responses to our RCOI, we know or have reason to believe that a portion of the Conflict Minerals we use originated or may have originated from the Covered Countries or may not be solely from recycled or scrap sources.

In accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Amkor has filed this Specialized Disclosure Form (Form SD) and the attached Conflict Minerals Report. Both reports are available on the “Investors” tab of www.amkor.com, under “Financial Information, SEC Filings”. This Form SD and Exhibit 1.01 contain references to our website. The information on this website is not incorporated by reference into this Form SD or Exhibit 1.01.

Item 1.02 Exhibit

As an exhibit to this Form SD, we provide the Conflict Minerals Report as required by Item 1.01.

Section 2 - Exhibits

Item 2.01 Exhibits

Exhibit 1.01 - Conflict Minerals Report, for the reporting period January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form.

2









SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.


Amkor Technology, Inc.
 
 
(Registrant)


/s/ Mark N. Rogers
 
May 20, 2021
Mark N. Rogers, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Date
3






Document

Exhibit 1.01

https://cdn.kscope.io/dcb991d745e7a973bcf3150a9813a611-image_02a.jpg

Conflict Minerals Report of Amkor Technology, Inc.

All information contained in this Conflict Minerals Report (the “Report”), other than statements of historical fact, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors including, among other things, our customers’ requirements to use certain suppliers, our suppliers’ responsiveness and cooperation with our due diligence efforts, our ability to implement improvements in our conflict minerals program, changes to the sourcing status of smelters and refiners in our supply chain, and our ability to identify and mitigate related risks in our supply chain. For a more complete discussion of these and other risk factors, see our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. We undertake no obligation to review or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after filing this Report with the SEC.

This Conflict Minerals Report (CMR) of Amkor Technology, Inc. (“Amkor”) for calendar year 2020 was prepared in accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Business Overview

Amkor is one of the world’s leading providers of outsourced semiconductor packaging and test services. Our packaging and test services are designed to meet application and chip specific requirements including: the required type of interconnect technology; size; thickness; and electrical, mechanical and thermal performance. Some of the materials we use when providing packaging services contain tantalum, tin, tungsten, or gold (collectively, “Conflict Minerals”). Test services involve checking that a packaged die meets its design and performance specifications and do not involve the use of Conflict Minerals.

The supply chain that provides us with Conflict Minerals is divided into upstream and downstream entities. An upstream entity is between the mine of origin and the smelter or refiner and includes miners, local traders, exporters from the country of mineral origin, international concentrate traders, mineral processors, smelters, and refiners. A downstream entity is between the smelter or refiner and the retailer and includes metal traders and exchanges, component manufacturers, product manufacturers, original equipment manufacturers, and retailers.


1








Amkor is a downstream entity and is typically several tiers removed from the smelter or refiner and mineral origin. We have limited visibility beyond our direct suppliers to entities within the supply chain. Therefore, we rely principally on our direct suppliers to provide us with sourcing information.

Due Diligence Overview

We undertook due diligence on the source and chain of custody of the Conflict Minerals we use when providing packaging services using tools and relying on information provided by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), an industry group that works to address Conflict Minerals issues within supply chains. One RMI tool we used was the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT), which facilitates the collection of information on the source of Conflict Minerals. We also relied on information from the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP), a voluntary initiative managed by the RMI, in which an independent third party validates the conflict minerals management procedures of a smelter or refiner to determine, with reasonable confidence, that the minerals it processes were sourced responsibly. If a smelter or refiner has committed to undergo an RMAP assessment, completed the relevant documents, and scheduled the RMAP assessment, they are designated by the RMI as “Active”. Upon completion of a successful audit, the smelter or refiner is designated by the RMI as “Conformant”.

Due Diligence Design

We designed our due diligence to conform to an internationally recognized due diligence framework, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, Third Edition, and related supplements on Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten and on Gold (collectively, the “OECD Framework”).

Due Diligence Performed

The OECD Framework provides a five-step outline for risk-based due diligence in the mineral supply chain. Using the OECD Framework, we list below the actions taken to exercise due diligence on the source of Conflict Minerals we used when providing packaging services.

Step 1 - Establish Strong Management Systems

Adopted and revised as needed our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy, which states our goal to source Conflict Minerals responsibly and is located on the “About Us” tab of www.amkor.com, under “Social Responsibility”.


2








Maintained an internal team to implement our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy, which includes members from the Procurement, Legal, and Quality Assurance teams, and reported program activities to Executive Management.

Updated processes and procedures as appropriate to meet the requirements of our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy.

Enforced the requirement that our direct suppliers undertake due diligence to achieve a conformant supply chain.

Maintained our record retention practice for records related to the sourcing of Conflict Minerals.

Continued our existing grievance system where suppliers can raise a question or make a report on ethical or legal issues, including issues relating to Conflict Minerals.


Step 2 - Identify and Assess Risks in the Supply Chain

Conducted a supply chain survey of our direct suppliers of Conflict Minerals using the CMRT to identify the smelters, refiners and/or mines of origin of Conflict Minerals.

Compared smelters, refiners and/or mines of origin identified by our direct suppliers against the list of smelters, refiners and mineral sourcing information that have received a “Conformant” designation by the RMAP.

Performed reviews of select suppliers to evaluate the reasonableness of responses received and alignment with the OECD Framework.

Step 3 - Design and Implement a Strategy to Respond to Identified Risks

Updated our annual risk management plan designed to mitigate the risk that our direct suppliers do not meet our expectations to achieve a conformant supply chain.

Conducted training and communicated periodically with our direct suppliers to increase awareness of our goal to achieve a conflict free supply chain and to reduce the risk of inaccurate information received from our suppliers.

Contacted a portion of smelters and refiners within our supply chain to encourage them to maintain their participation in the RMAP or industry equivalent. Our outreach efforts included in person training and meetings with select smelters and industry associations.

Reported information on the source and chain of custody of conflict minerals in our supply chain to Executive Management.
3









Step 4 - Carry Out Independent Third-party Audits of Smelter/Refiner’s Due Diligence Practices

Maintained our membership in the RMI, an industry group that has implemented the RMAP to carry out independent Third-party Audits of a Smelter/Refiner’s Conflict Minerals Management Practices. As a member, we have relied on the results of the RMAP to provide smelter, refiner, and mineral sourcing information on the Conflict Minerals we used when providing packaging services.

Step 5 - Report Annually on Supply Chain Due Diligence

Published the results of our supply chain due diligence within our 2020 Form SD and Conflict Minerals Report, which is located on the “Investors” tab of www.amkor.com under “Financial Information, SEC Filings”.

Due Diligence Results

The results of our due diligence indicate that the sources of Conflict Minerals are (1) from recycled or scrap materials, (2) from within the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries (the “Covered Countries”), or (3) from outside the Covered Countries. We received responses from all our direct suppliers subject to our supply chain survey for 2020. Collectively, their responses listed 235 smelters and refiners within their supply chains as of December 31, 2020. Of this amount, the RMAP has designated 234 smelters and refiners as Conformant and one refiner as Active as of December 31, 2020.

The following tables list the population of smelters, refiners, and origin of Conflict Minerals within our supply chain for 2020. Our efforts to determine this population are described above under the caption “Due Diligence Performed”. The information presented is derived from information provided by our direct suppliers and the RMI.

4








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
Mineral
Smelter and Refiner Name
Country Location
Gold
8853 S.p.A.
Italy
Gold
Advanced Chemical Company
United States of America
Gold
Aida Chemical Industries Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Al Etihad Gold Refinery DMCC
United Arab Emirates
Gold
Allgemeine Gold-und Silberscheideanstalt A.G.
Germany
Gold
Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC)
Uzbekistan
Gold
AngloGold Ashanti Corrego do Sitio Mineracao
Brazil
Gold
Argor-Heraeus S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Asahi Pretec Corp.
Japan
Gold
Asahi Refining Canada Ltd.
Canada
Gold
Asahi Refining USA Inc.
United States of America
Gold
Asaka Riken Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
AU Traders and Refiners
South Africa
Gold
Aurubis AG
Germany
Gold
Bangalore Refinery
India
Gold
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines)
Philippines
Gold
Boliden AB
Sweden
Gold
C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG
Germany
Gold
CCR Refinery - Glencore Canada Corporation
Canada
Gold
Cendres + Metaux S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Chimet S.p.A.
Italy
Gold
Chugai Mining
Japan
Gold
DODUCO Contacts and Refining GmbH
Germany
Gold
Dowa
Japan
Gold
DS PRETECH Co., Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Gold
DSC (Do Sung Corporation)
Korea, Republic of
Gold
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. East Plant
Japan
Gold
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. North Plant
Japan
Gold
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. West Plant
Japan
Gold
Emirates Gold DMCC
United Arab Emirates

5








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
MineralSmelter and Refiner NameCountry Location
Gold
Geib Refining Corporation
United States of America
Gold
Gold Refinery of Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Heimerle + Meule GmbH
Germany
Gold
Heraeus Metals Hong Kong Ltd.
China
Gold
Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG
Germany
Gold
Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Istanbul Gold Refinery
Turkey
Gold
Italpreziosi
Italy
Gold
Japan Mint
Japan
Gold
Jiangxi Copper Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
JSC Uralelectromed
Russian Federation
Gold
JX Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Kazzinc
Kazakhstan
Gold
Kennecott Utah Copper LLC
United States of America
Gold
KGHM Polska Miedz Spolka Akcyjna
Poland
Gold
Kojima Chemicals Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Korea Zinc Co., Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Gold
Kyrgyzaltyn JSC
Kyrgyzstan
Gold
L'Orfebre S.A.
Andorra
Gold
LS-NIKKO Copper Inc.
Korea, Republic of
Gold
LT Metal Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Gold
Marsam Metals
Brazil
Gold
Materion
United States of America
Gold
Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Metalor Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd.
China
Gold
Metalor Technologies (Singapore) Pte., Ltd.
Singapore
Gold
Metalor Technologies (Suzhou) Ltd.
China
Gold
Metalor Technologies S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Metalor USA Refining Corporation
United States of America

6








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
Mineral
Smelter and Refiner Name
Country Location
Gold
Metalurgica Met-Mex Penoles S.A. De C.V.
Mexico
Gold
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation
Japan
Gold
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
MMTC-PAMP India Pvt., Ltd.
India
Gold
Moscow Special Alloys Processing Plant
Russian Federation
Gold
Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.S.
Turkey
Gold
Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat
Uzbekistan
Gold
Nihon Material Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Ogussa Osterreichische Gold- und Silber-Scheideanstalt GmbH
Austria
Gold
Ohura Precious Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
OJSC "The Gulidov Krasnoyarsk Non-Ferrous Metals Plant" (OJSC Krastsvetmet)
Russian Federation
Gold
OJSC Novosibirsk Refinery
Russian Federation
Gold
PAMP S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Planta Recuperadora de Metales SpA
Chile
Gold
Prioksky Plant of Non-Ferrous Metals
Russian Federation
Gold
PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk
Indonesia
Gold
PX Precinox S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Rand Refinery (Pty) Ltd.
South Africa
Gold
REMONDIS PMR B.V.
Netherlands
Gold
Royal Canadian Mint
Canada
Gold
SAAMP
France
Gold
Safimet S.p.A
Italy
Gold
SAFINA A.S.
Czechia
Gold
Samduck Precious Metals
Korea, Republic of
Gold
SAXONIA Edelmetalle GmbH
Germany
Gold
SEMPSA Joyeria Plateria S.A.
Spain
Gold
Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Sichuan Tianze Precious Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Singway Technology Co., Ltd.
Taiwan
Gold
SOE Shyolkovsky Factory of Secondary Precious Metals
Russian Federation


7








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
MineralSmelter and Refiner NameCountry Location
Gold
Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp.
Taiwan
Gold
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
SungEel HiMetal Co., Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Gold
T.C.A S.p.A
Italy
Gold
Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K.
Japan
Gold
The Refinery of Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd.
China
Gold
Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
TOO Tau-Ken-Altyn
Kazakhstan
Gold
Torecom
Korea, Republic of
Gold
Umicore Precious Metals Thailand
Thailand
Gold
Umicore S.A. Business Unit Precious Metals Refining
Belgium
Gold
United Precious Metal Refining, Inc.
United States of America
Gold
Valcambi S.A.
Switzerland
Gold
Western Australian Mint (T/a The Perth Mint)
Australia
Gold
WIELAND Edelmetalle GmbH
Germany
Gold
Yamakin Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Yokohama Metal Co., Ltd.
Japan
Gold
Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation
China
Tantalum
Asaka Riken Co., Ltd.
Japan
Tantalum
Changsha South Tantalum Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
D Block Metals, LLC
United States of America
Tantalum
Exotech Inc.
United States of America
Tantalum
F&X Electro-Materials Ltd.
China
Tantalum
FIR Metals & Resource Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Global Advanced Metals Aizu
Japan
Tantalum
Global Advanced Metals Boyertown
United States of America
Tantalum
Guangdong Zhiyuan New Material Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Co., Ltd.
Thailand
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Hermsdorf GmbH
Germany
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Inc.
United States of America

8








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
MineralSmelter and Refiner NameCountry Location
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Ltd.
Japan
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co. KG
Germany
Tantalum
H.C. Starck Tantalum and Niobium GmbH
Germany
Tantalum
Hengyang King Xing Lifeng New Materials Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiangxi Dinghai Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiangxi Tuohong New Raw Material
China
Tantalum
JiuJiang JinXin Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiujiang Tanbre Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Jiujiang Zhongao Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
KEMET Blue Metals
Mexico
Tantalum
LSM Brasil S.A.
Brazil
Tantalum
Metallurgical Products India Pvt., Ltd.
India
Tantalum
Mineracao Taboca S.A.
Brazil
Tantalum
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.
Japan
Tantalum
Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
NPM Silmet AS
Estonia
Tantalum
PRG Dooel
North Macedonia
Tantalum
QuantumClean
United States of America
Tantalum
Resind Industria e Comercio Ltda.
Brazil
Tantalum
Solikamsk Magnesium Works OAO
Russian Federation
Tantalum
Taki Chemical Co., Ltd.
Japan
Tantalum
Telex Metals
United States of America
Tantalum
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC
Kazakhstan
Tantalum
XinXing HaoRong Electronic Material Co., Ltd.
China
Tantalum
Yanling Jincheng Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Alpha
United States of America
Tin
Chenzhou Yunxiang Mining and Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Chifeng Dajingzi Tin Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
China Tin Group Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Dowa
Japan

9








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
MineralSmelter and Refiner NameCountry Location
Tin
EM Vinto
Bolivia
Tin
Fenix Metals
Poland
Tin
Gejiu Fengming Metallurgy Chemical Plant
China
Tin
Gejiu Kai Meng Industry and Trade LLC
China
Tin
Gejiu Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Gejiu Yunxin Nonferrous Electrolysis Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Gejiu Zili Mining and Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Guangdong Hanhe Non-Ferrous Metal Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
HuiChang Hill Tin Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Jiangxi New Nanshan Technology Ltd.
China
Tin
Luna Smelter, Ltd.
Rwanda
Tin
Ma'anshan Weitai Tin Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Magnu's Minerais Metais e Ligas Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC)
Malaysia
Tin
Melt Metais e Ligas S.A.
Brazil
Tin
Metallic Resources, Inc.
United States of America
Tin
Metallo Belgium N.V.
Belgium
Tin
Metallo Spain S.L.U.
Spain
Tin
Mineracao Taboca S.A.
Brazil
Tin
Minsur
Peru
Tin
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation
Japan
Tin
O.M. Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
Thailand
Tin
O.M. Manufacturing Philippines, Inc.
Philippines
Tin
Operaciones Metalurgicas S.A.
Bolivia
Tin
PT Artha Cipta Langgeng
Indonesia
Tin
PT ATD Makmur Mandiri Jaya
Indonesia
Tin
PT Babel Surya Alam Lestari
Indonesia
Tin
PT Bangka Serumpun
Indonesia
Tin
PT Menara Cipta Mulia
Indonesia
Tin
PT Mitra Stania Prima
Indonesia

10








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
MineralSmelter and Refiner NameCountry Location
Tin
PT Prima Timah Utama
Indonesia
Tin
PT Rajawali Rimba Perkasa
Indonesia
Tin
PT Rajehan Ariq
Indonesia
Tin
PT Refined Bangka Tin
Indonesia
Tin
PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa
Indonesia
Tin
PT Timah Tbk Kundur
Indonesia
Tin
PT Timah Tbk Mentok
Indonesia
Tin
Resind Industria e Comercio Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Rui Da Hung
Taiwan
Tin
Soft Metais Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Thai Nguyen Mining and Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
Viet Nam
Tin
Thaisarco
Thailand
Tin
Tin Technology & Refining
United States of America
Tin
White Solder Metalurgia e Mineracao Ltda.
Brazil
Tin
Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tin
Yunnan Tin Company Limited
China
Tin
Yunnan Yunfan Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
A.L.M.T. Corp.
Japan
Tungsten
ACL Metais Eireli
Brazil
Tungsten
Asia Tungsten Products Vietnam Ltd.
Vietnam
Tungsten
Chenzhou Diamond Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Fujian Ganmin RareMetal Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Haichuang Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Jiangwu Ferrotungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Global Tungsten & Powders Corp.
United States of America
Tungsten
Guangdong Xianglu Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co. KG
Germany

11








Smelters and Refiners Processing Conflict Minerals
MineralSmelter and Refiner NameCountry Location
Tungsten
H.C. Starck Tungsten GmbH
Germany
Tungsten
Hunan Chenzhou Mining Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Hunan Chunchang Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Hydrometallurg, JSC
Russian Federation
Tungsten
Japan New Metals Co., Ltd.
Japan
Tungsten
Jiangwu H.C. Starck Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Gan Bei Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Tonggu Non-ferrous Metallurgical & Chemical Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Xinsheng Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Jiangxi Yaosheng Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Kennametal Fallon
United States of America
Tungsten
Kennametal Huntsville
United States of America
Tungsten
KGETS Co., Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Tungsten
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
Taiwan
Tungsten
Malipo Haiyu Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Masan Tungsten Chemical LLC (MTC)
Vietnam
Tungsten
Moliren Ltd.
Russian Federation
Tungsten
Niagara Refining LLC
United States of America
Tungsten
Philippine Chuangxin Industrial Co., Inc.
Philippines
Tungsten
Unecha Refractory metals plant
Russian Federation
Tungsten
Wolfram Bergbau und Hutten AG
Austria
Tungsten
Woltech Korea Co., Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Tungsten
Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
China
Tungsten
Xinfeng Huarui Tungsten & Molybdenum New Material Co., Ltd.
China

12








Countries of Origin for Conflict Minerals, To the Extent Known
Argentina
Guyana
Russian Federation
Australia
India
Rwanda
Austria
Indonesia
Sierra Leone
Benin
Japan
Somaliland
Bolivia
Kazakhstan
South Africa
Brazil
Laos
Spain
Burundi
Madagascar
Swaziland
Canada
Malaysia
Taiwan
China
Mexico
Tanzania
Colombia
Mongolia
Thailand
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Mozambique
Uganda
Ecuador
Myanmar
United Kingdom
Eritrea
Namibia
United States of America
Ethiopia
Niger
Uzbekistan
France
Nigeria
Venezuela
Germany
Peru
Vietnam
Ghana
Portugal
Zimbabwe
Guinea



Due Diligence Improvements

We plan to undertake the following steps in 2021 to build on our efforts to source Conflict Minerals responsibly:

Continue our engagement with our direct suppliers with periodic communications, training and evaluation of smelter and refiner data provided.

Maintain our efforts to identify the smelters and refiners within our supply chain by evaluating the information received from our direct suppliers and comparing it with updated information published by the RMI.

Contact a portion of our smelters and refiners directly to encourage them to maintain their participation in the RMAP or industry equivalent.

Continue our active involvement in the RMI and support industry efforts to improve the monitoring and reporting of supply chain activities.
13