UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

 

 

Commission File Number 000-29472

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

1900 South Price Road
Chandler, AZ 85286
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

 

(480) 821-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock as of July 29, 2011 was 197,920,044.

 

 

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

 

Basis of Presentation.  The Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures as of June 30, 2011 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, are unaudited, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The December 31, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In our opinion, these financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair statement of the results for the interim periods. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on Form 10-K with the SEC on February 24, 2011. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “Amkor,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “company” are to Amkor Technology, Inc. and our subsidiaries.

 

The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the functional currency for the majority of our foreign subsidiaries. For our subsidiaries and affiliate in Japan, the local currency is the functional currency.

 

Use of Estimates.  The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, using management’s best estimates and judgments where appropriate. These estimates and judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The estimates and judgments will also affect the reported amounts for certain revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and judgments.

 

 

Recently Adopted Standards

 

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amended Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, to require additional disclosures related to activity within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. These provisions of the ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Our adoption of these provisions on January 1, 2011, did not have an impact on our financial statements.

 

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which supersedes certain guidance in ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition — Multiple Element Arrangements. This topic requires an entity to allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of an arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2010. Our adoption of ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2011, did not have an impact on our financial statements.

 

Recently Issued Standards

 

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820). This ASU updates certain requirements for measuring fair value and disclosure regarding fair value measurement. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have on our financial statements.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This ASU eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted and full retrospective application is required. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will have on our financial statements.

 

 

All of our share-based compensation to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted shares, are measured at fair value and expensed over the service period (generally the vesting period). The following table presents share-based compensation expense attributable to stock options and restricted shares. There is no deferred income tax benefit in either period.

 

 

The following table presents share-based compensation expense as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Stock Options

 

The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

 

 

The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate weighted average fair values of the options granted for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

 

The intrinsic value of options exercised for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, was less than $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, was $0.1 and $0.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cash received for stock option exercises was $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively. No tax benefits were realized. The related cash receipts are included in financing activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Total unrecognized compensation expense from stock options, including a forfeiture estimate, was approximately $2.3 million as of June 30, 2011, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years beginning July 1, 2011. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different than what we have anticipated, share-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Restricted Shares

 

The following table summarizes our restricted share activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

 

 

Awards vested include 142,000 shares for retirement eligible recipients whose restricted shares are treated for accounting and tax purposes as if vested when they meet the retirement eligible date. The fair value of these shares upon vesting during 2011 was $1.1 million. Of those 142,000 shares, 51,000 shares were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations and are treated as treasury stock, at a cost of $0.4 million.

 

The valuation of restricted stock shares is determined based on the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant and amortized on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period. The unrecognized compensation cost, including a forfeiture estimate, was $4.4 million as of June 30, 2011, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.0 years beginning July 1, 2011. To the extent that the actual forfeiture rate is different than what we have anticipated, the share-based compensation expense related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

 

 

Our income tax expense of $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily reflects $4.1 million of expense related to income taxes at certain of our foreign operations, $1.0 million of foreign withholding taxes, $1.6 million of deferred taxes on undistributed earnings from our investment in J-Devices and $0.3 million of state income taxes. Our income tax expense reflects income taxed in foreign jurisdictions where we benefit from tax holidays. At June 30, 2011, we had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards totaling $395.6 million, which expire at various times through 2031. Additionally, at June 30, 2011, we had $73.2 million of non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, the vast majority of which will expire at various times through 2018.

 

We maintain a valuation allowance on all of our U.S. net deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss carryforwards. We also have valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions. Such valuation allowances are released as the related tax benefits are realized on our tax returns or when sufficient net positive evidence exists to conclude it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized.

 

Our gross unrecognized tax benefits decreased from $10.5 million at December 31, 2010, to $9.9 million as of June 30, 2011, primarily due to a $1.0 million settlement of an uncertain tax position offset by a $0.4 million increase in the reserve resulting from the evaluation of new information obtained during the six months ended June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, substantially all of our unrecognized tax benefits would reduce our effective tax rate, if recognized. We are seeking rulings from local taxing authorities to confirm the availability of unrecognized tax benefits related to revenue attribution and eligibility for certain tax incentives. The rulings are currently expected within the next twelve months, at which time our unrecognized tax benefits may be reduced by up to $8.3 million. Our unrecognized tax benefits are subject to change as examinations of tax years are completed. Tax return examinations involve uncertainties and there can be no assurances that the outcome of examinations will be favorable.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income attributable to Amkor common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding includes restricted shares held by retirement eligible recipients and excludes treasury stock. Unvested share-based compensation awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. As discussed in Note 3, we grant restricted shares which entitle recipients to voting and nonforfeitable dividend rights from the date of grant. As a result, we have applied the two-class method to determine earnings per share.

 

Diluted EPS is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares include outstanding stock options, unvested restricted shares and convertible debt. The following table summarizes the computation of basic and diluted EPS:

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

The following table summarizes the potential shares of common stock that were excluded from diluted EPS, because the effect of including these potential shares was antidilutive:

 

 

 

The following table reflects the changes in equity and comprehensive income attributable to both Amkor and the noncontrolling interests:

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Inventories consist of the following:

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:

 

 

The following table reconciles our activity related to property, plant and equipment additions as reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets to property, plant and equipment purchases as presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

 

 

 

Acquired intangibles as of June 30, 2011, consist of the following:

 

 

Acquired intangibles as of December 31, 2010, consist of the following:

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Amortization of identifiable intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $1.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Amortization of identifiable intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $2.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Based on the amortizing assets recognized in our balance sheet at June 30, 2011, amortization for each of the next five years is estimated as follows:

 

 

 

Investments consist of the following:

 

 

J-Devices Corporation

 

On October 30, 2009, Amkor and Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba”) invested in Nakaya Microdevices Corporation (“NMD”) and formed a joint venture to provide semiconductor assembly and final testing services in Japan. As a result of the transaction, NMD is now owned 60% by the existing shareholders of NMD, 30% by Amkor and 10% by Toshiba and has changed its name to J-Devices. J-Devices is a variable interest entity, but as we are not the primary beneficiary, the investment is accounted for under the equity method as an unconsolidated affiliate.

 

Our investment includes our 30% equity interest and call options to acquire additional equity interests. The call options, at our discretion, permit us to subscribe to new or existing J-Devices’ shares until our maximum ownership ratio is 60%, 66% and 80% beginning in 2012, 2014 and 2015, respectively. In 2014 and beyond, Toshiba has at its discretion, a put option which allows Toshiba to sell shares to us if we have exercised any of our call options. The exercise price for all options is determined using a contractual pricing formula based primarily upon the financial position of J-Devices at the time of exercise.

 

Under the equity method of accounting, we recognize our 30% proportionate share of J-Devices’ net income or loss, which includes J-Devices’ income taxes in Japan, during each accounting period as a change in our investment in unconsolidated affiliate. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, our equity in earnings in J-Devices, net of J-Devices’ income taxes in Japan, was $2.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, our equity in earnings in J-Devices, net of J-Devices’ income taxes in Japan, was $1.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively. In addition, as a change in our investment in unconsolidated affiliate, we record equity method adjustments for the amortization of a basis difference as our carrying value exceeded our equity in the net assets of J-Devices at the date of investment and other adjustments required by the equity method.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

In conjunction with entering into the joint venture, one of our existing subsidiaries in Japan purchased assembly and test equipment from Toshiba and leased the equipment to J-Devices under an agreement which is accounted for as a direct financing lease. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in interest income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in interest income. Our lease receivables, net consist of the following:

 

 

 

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Following is a summary of short-term borrowings and long-term debt:

 

 

There have been no borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2011; however, we have utilized $0.4 million of the available letter of credit sub-limit of $25.0 million. The borrowing base for the revolving credit facility is based on the amount of our eligible accounts receivable, which exceeded $100.0 million as of June 30, 2011. This facility includes a number of affirmative and negative covenants, which could restrict our operations. If we were to default under the first lien revolving credit facility, we would not be permitted to draw additional amounts and the banks could accelerate our obligation to pay all outstanding amounts.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

In June 2011, we used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 6.625% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Notes”), discussed below, to fund the tender offer and call for redemption of the entire $264.3 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 9.25% Senior Notes due 2016 (the “2016 Notes”), to refinance the entire $42.6 million of our 2.50% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due May 2011, to pay related fees, expenses and accrued interest and for general corporate purposes. We purchased $156.7 million of the 2016 Notes in the tender offer and $107.6 million in the call. We recorded a $12.8 million loss on extinguishment related to the premiums and fees paid for the tender (approximately $7.8 million) and call (approximately $5.0 million) of the 2016 Notes and a $2.7 million charge for the write-off of the associated unamortized deferred debt issuance costs. Both charges are included in loss on debt retirement, net in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

In May 2011, we issued $400.0 million of the 2021 Notes. The 2021 Notes were issued at par and are senior unsecured obligations. Interest is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year at a rate of 6.625%, commencing on December 1, 2011. In addition, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the initial purchasers of the 2021 Notes where we agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to cause to become effective a registration statement to exchange the 2021 Notes for freely tradable notes issued by us. If we are unable to effect the exchange offer within 210 days of the issuance of the 2021 Notes, we have agreed to pay additional interest on the notes up to 0.5%. In connection with the issuance of the 2021 Notes, Mr. James J. Kim, our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and our largest stockholder, and 915 Investments, LP, an affiliate of Mr. James J. Kim (collectively, the “Kim Purchasers”) agreed to purchase $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes. In addition, we entered into a letter agreement with the Kim Purchasers pursuant to which we agreed to register the resale of the 2021 Notes held by the Kim Purchasers on a shelf registration statement upon request of the Kim Purchasers at any time after May 20, 2012. We incurred $5.9 million of debt issuance costs associated with the 2021 Notes in the three months ended June 30, 2011.

 

In November 2005, we issued $100.0 million of our 6.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due December 2013 (the “December 2013 Notes”) in a private placement to Mr. James J. Kim, our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, and certain Kim family members. Following a call for redemption of the entire $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of the December 2013 Notes, holders of all $100.0 million of the outstanding December 2013 Notes converted their notes into an aggregate of 13,351,131 shares of our common stock in January 2011. There was no gain or loss recorded as a result of the conversion. Forfeited accrued interest of $0.9 million and unamortized deferred debt costs of $0.4 million were included in the net carrying amount of the debt recorded to our capital accounts upon conversion.

 

In January 2009, Amkor Assembly & Test (Shanghai) Co, Ltd. (“AATS”), a Chinese subsidiary, entered into a $50.0 million U.S. dollar denominated working capital facility agreement with a Chinese bank maturing in January 2011. The facility was collateralized with certain real property and buildings in China. Principal amounts borrowed were required to be repaid within twelve months of the drawdown date and could be prepaid at any time without penalty. In January 2011, the outstanding balance of $15.0 million was repaid at maturity. In January 2011, AATS entered into a new $50.0 million U.S. dollar denominated working capital facility agreement with the same Chinese bank maturing in January 2013. The new facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.8% (3.25% as of June 30, 2011), which is payable in semi-annual payments. All other terms and conditions are consistent with the prior facility. At June 30, 2011, $20.0 million was outstanding under the facility. The working capital facility contains certain affirmative and negative covenants, which could restrict our operations. If we were to default on our obligations under any of these facilities, we would not be permitted to draw additional amounts, and the lenders could accelerate our obligation to pay all outstanding amounts.

 

In April 2010, Amkor Technology Taiwan Ltd, a Taiwanese subsidiary, entered into a 1.5 billion Taiwan dollar (approximately $47 million at inception) term loan with a Taiwanese bank due April 2015. The term loan accrues interest at the 90-day commercial paper rate plus 0.835%. The interest rate at June 30, 2011, was 2.34%. The term

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

loan is collateralized with certain land, buildings and equipment in Taiwan. In March 2011, we amended the principal repayment schedule. As a result, semiannual principal payments of 150 million Taiwan dollars (approximately $5.2 million) will begin in April 2012 and the remaining 600 million Taiwan dollars (approximately $20.7 million) will be due on the final maturity date.

 

In June 2011, Amkor Technology Korea, Inc., a Korean subsidiary (“ATK”) entered into a KRW 50.0 billion (approximately $46 million at inception) revolving credit facility with a Korean Bank with a term of 12 months. The loan bears interest at the CD base interest rate (as quoted by Korea Financial Investment Association) plus 2.20%. Principal is payable upon maturity and interest is paid monthly. The loan is collateralized with certain land, buildings and equipment at our ATK facilities. There have been no borrowings under this revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2011.

 

In July 2011, ATK entered into a $50.0 million three-year secured term loan with a Korean bank (the “ATK Loan”) and drew $7.4 million with the remainder to be drawn throughout the three-year term. The ATK Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.96% and is due in full upon maturity in 2014. The ATK Loan is secured by substantially all land, factories and equipment located at our ATK facilities. The proceeds from the term loan will be used to fund future capital expenditures.

 

Our secured bank debt agreements and the indentures governing our outstanding notes contain a number of affirmative and negative covenants which could restrict our operations. We were in compliance with all of our covenants as of June 30, 2011.

 

 

Foreign Pension Plans

 

Our Philippine, Taiwanese and Japanese subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all of their respective employees who are not covered by statutory plans. Charges to expense are based upon actuarial analyses. The components of net periodic pension cost for these defined benefit plans are as follows:

 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we contributed $0.1 million and $0.2 to the pension plans, respectively. We expect to contribute approximately $3.3 million during the remainder of 2011.

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we contributed $7.4 million and $7.5 million to the pension plans, respectively.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Korean Severance Plan

 

Our Korean subsidiary participates in an accrued severance plan that covers employees and directors with at least one year of service. Eligible employees are entitled to receive a lump-sum payment upon termination of employment, based on their length of service, seniority and average monthly wages at the time of termination. Accrued severance benefits are estimated assuming all eligible employees were to terminate their employment at the balance sheet date. Our contributions to the National Pension Plan of the Republic of Korea are deducted from accrued severance benefit liabilities.

 

The provision recorded for severance benefits for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $7.8 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The provision recorded for severance benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $13.5 and $10.5 million, respectively. The balance recorded in non-current pension and severance obligations for accrued severance at our Korean subsidiary was $96.3 million and $82.5 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Total pension and severance obligations at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, were $103.3 million and $88.6 million, respectively.

 

 

The accounting framework for determining fair value includes a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to measure fair value, which enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements. The fair value hierarchy consists of three tiers as follows: Level 1, defined as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

 

Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring basis

 

Our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are invested in U.S. money market funds and various U.S. and foreign bank operating and time deposit accounts, which are due on demand or carry a maturity date of less than three months when purchased. No restrictions have been imposed on us regarding withdrawal of balances with respect to our cash and cash equivalents as a result of liquidity or other credit market issues affecting the money market funds we invest in or the counterparty financial institutions holding our deposits. Money market funds and restricted cash are valued using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets as summarized in the following table as of June 30, 2011:

 

 

Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

We measure certain assets and liabilities, including property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and an equity investment, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Such measurements are generally obtained from third party

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

appraisal reports. Impairment losses on property, plant and equipment included in cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, were $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Impairment losses on property, plant and equipment included in cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, were $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

 

Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 

We measure the fair value of our debt on a quarterly basis for disclosure purposes. The following table presents the financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

 

The estimated fair value of the debt is based primarily on quoted market prices reported on the respective balance sheet dates for our senior and senior subordinated notes. The estimated fair value for the debt of our subsidiaries is based on market based assumptions including current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements adjusted for duration, optionality and risk profile.

 

 

We have a $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility that matures in April 2015. The facility has a letter of credit sub-facility of $25.0 million. As of June 30, 2011, we have $0.4 million of standby letters of credit outstanding and have an additional $24.6 million available for letters of credit. Such standby letters of credit are used in the ordinary course of our business and are collateralized by our cash balances.

 

We generally warrant that our services will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner and in compliance with our customers’ specifications. We accrue costs for known warranty issues. Historically, our warranty costs have been immaterial.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

We are involved in claims and legal proceedings and we may become involved in other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. We evaluate these claims and legal matters on a case-by-case basis to make a determination as to the impact, if any, on our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Except as indicated below, we currently believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims and proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact to us. Our evaluation of the potential impact of these claims and legal proceedings on our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could change in the future. Attorney fees related to legal matters are expensed as incurred. We have not recorded any accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the legal proceedings described below, except where noted otherwise, based on our belief that liabilities, while possible, are not probable. Further, except where noted otherwise, any possible range of loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

 

Arbitration Proceedings with Tessera, Inc.

 

On March 2, 2006, Tessera, Inc. filed a request for arbitration with the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (the “ICC”), captioned Tessera, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc. The subject

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

matter of the arbitration was a license agreement (“License Agreement”) entered into between Tessera and our predecessor in 1996.

 

On October 27, 2008, the arbitration panel in that proceeding issued an interim order in this matter. While the panel found that most of the packages accused by Tessera were not subject to the patent royalty provisions of the License Agreement, the panel did find that past royalties were due to Tessera as damages for some infringing packages. The panel also denied Tessera’s request to terminate the License Agreement.

 

On January 9, 2009, the panel issued the final damage award in this matter awarding Tessera $60.6 million in damages for past royalties due under the License Agreement. The award was for the period March 2, 2002 through December 1, 2008. The final award, plus interest, and the royalties through December 2008 amounting to $64.7 million, was expensed in 2008 and paid when due in February 2009.

 

Following Tessera’s favorable decision in the U.S International Trade Commission in May 2009 against some of our customers, Tessera began making repeated statements to customers and others claiming that we were in breach of the royalty provisions of the License Agreement. We informed Tessera that we believed we were in full compliance with the License Agreement and of our intent to continue making the royalty payments when due in accordance with the terms of the License Agreement.

 

On August 7, 2009, we filed a request for arbitration in the ICC against Tessera, captioned Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. (the “Arbitration”). We instituted this action in order to obtain declaratory relief confirming that we are a licensee in good standing under our 1996 License Agreement with Tessera and that the License Agreement remains in effect. We are also seeking damages and injunctive relief regarding Tessera’s tortious interference with our contractual relations and prospective economic advantage, including Tessera’s false and misleading statements questioning our status as a licensee under the License Agreement.

 

On November 2, 2009, Tessera filed an answer to our request for arbitration and counterclaims in the ICC. In the answer and counterclaims, Tessera denied Amkor’s claims. Tessera also alleged breach of contract, seeking termination of the License Agreement and asserting that Amkor owes Tessera additional royalties under the License Agreement, including royalties for use of thirteen U.S. and six foreign patents that Tessera did not assert in the previous arbitration. Tessera has since dropped its claims on five of those patents. Tessera also alleged that Amkor tortiously interfered with Tessera’s prospective business relationships and seeks damages. On February 17, 2011, Tessera sent Amkor a notice of termination of the License Agreement.

 

We filed our response to Tessera’s answer on January 15, 2010, denying Tessera’s claims and filed a motion with the panel seeking priority consideration and phased early determination of issues from the previous arbitration decision, including the proper method for calculating royalties under the License Agreement for periods subsequent to December 1, 2008. On March 28, 2010, the panel granted our request for priority consideration and phased early determination.

 

The first hearing regarding the issues from the previous arbitration was held in December 2010 and in July 2011, the Panel issued its decision in the first phase of the Arbitration. The Panel found that we do not owe any of the approximately $18 million of additional royalties claimed by Tessera for packages assembled by us for customers who had been involved in proceedings with Tessera before the U.S. International Trade Commission. The Panel also did not grant Tessera’s request to terminate the License Agreement in the first phase of the arbitration and deferred making any determination regarding termination until the full Arbitration is completed.

 

Our request for a declaration confirming that we are in compliance with the License Agreement and that our royalty calculations from the previous arbitration were correct was denied. The Panel found that we had materially breached the License Agreement by not paying the full amount of royalties due and by failing to satisfy the audit provisions of the License Agreement. The amount of royalties claimed by Tessera that remain unpaid is approximately $700,000, and we estimate that the amount owed, after applying offsets, is approximately $125,000.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The hearing on Tessera’s assertion of infringement on additional patents (now ten U.S. and four foreign patents) and the payment of additional royalties under the License Agreement relating to the additional asserted patents is currently scheduled for August 2011. Tessera initially claimed that the amount in dispute in the Arbitration was approximately $100 million and is now claiming more than $400 million of royalties under the License Agreement for the additional patents. We believe this amount is speculative and strongly dispute these claims. However, the outcome of this matter is uncertain and an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

 

In connection with the Arbitration, we deposited $17.0 million in an escrow account, which is classified as restricted cash in current assets at June 30, 2011. This amount represented our good faith estimate of the disputed amount of royalties that we expected Tessera to allege that we owed on packages assembled by us for one of our customers involved in proceedings with Tessera before the U.S. ITC related to the patents at issue in the prior arbitration. As a result of the Panel’s decision in the first phase of the Arbitration, we expect that the funds held in escrow will be returned to us.

 

In May 2011, Tessera filed a new Request for Arbitration against Amkor seeking undisclosed damages and a declaration that the License Agreement has been terminated. Amkor disputes that Tessera has a right to terminate the License Agreement or that the License Agreement has been terminated. We believe that Tessera’s claims in this new arbitration are without merit.

 

Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem Semiconductor Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc.

 

On November 17, 2003, we filed a complaint against Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem Semiconductor Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc. (collectively “Carsem”) with the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in Washington, D.C., alleging infringement of our United States Patent Nos. 6,433,277; 6,455,356 and 6,630,728 (collectively the “Amkor Patents”) and seeking, under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, an exclusion order barring the importation by Carsem of infringing products. We allege that by making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing into the U.S. the Carsem Dual and Quad Flat No-Lead Packages, Carsem has infringed on one or more of our MicroLeadFrame packaging technology claims in the Amkor Patents.

 

On November 18, 2003, we also filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging infringement of the Amkor Patents and seeking an injunction enjoining Carsem from further infringing the Amkor Patents, compensatory damages and treble damages due to willful infringement plus interest, costs and attorney’s fees. This District Court action has been stayed pending resolution of the ITC case.

 

The ITC Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted an evidentiary hearing during July and August of 2004 in Washington D.C. and, on November 18, 2004, issued an Initial Determination that Carsem infringed some of our patent claims relating to our MicroLeadFrame package technology, that some of our 21 asserted patent claims are valid, that we have a domestic industry in our patents, and that all of our asserted patent claims are enforceable. However, the ALJ did not find a statutory violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act.

 

We filed a petition in November 2004 to have the ALJ’s ruling reviewed by the full International Trade Commission. On March 31, 2005, the ITC ordered a new claims construction related to various disputed claim terms and remanded the case to the ALJ for further proceedings. On November 9, 2005, the ALJ issued an Initial Determination on remand finding that Carsem infringed some of our patent claims and that Carsem had violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act.

 

On remand, the ITC had also authorized the ALJ to reopen the record on certain discovery issues related to a subpoena of documents from a third party. An order by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia enforcing the subpoena became final on January 9, 2009, and the third party produced documents pursuant to the subpoena.

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

On July 1, 2009, the Commission remanded the investigation for a second time to the ALJ to reopen the record to admit into evidence documents and related discovery obtained from the enforcement of the above-referenced third-party subpoena.

 

Following a two-day hearing, on October 30, 2009, the ALJ issued an Initial Determination reaffirming his prior ruling that the Carsem Dual and Quad Flat No-Lead Packages infringe some of Amkor’s patent claims relating to MicroLeadFrame package technology, that all of Amkor’s asserted patent claims are valid, and that Carsem violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act.

 

On December 16, 2009, the Commission ordered a review of the ALJ’s Initial Determination. On February 18, 2010, the Commission reversed a finding by the ALJ on the issue of whether a certain invention constitutes prior art to Amkor’s asserted patents. The Commission remanded the investigation to the ALJ to make further findings in light of the Commission’s ruling. On March 22, 2010, the ALJ issued a Supplemental Initial Determination. Although the ALJ’s ruling did not disturb the prior finding that Carsem Dual and Quad Flat No-Lead Packages infringe some of Amkor’s patent claims relating to MicroLeadFrame technology, the ALJ found that some of Amkor’s patent claims are invalid and, as a result, the ALJ did not find a statutory violation of the Tariff Act. On July 20, 2010, the Commission issued a Notice of Commission Final Determination, in which the Commission determined that there is no violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act and terminated the investigation. We have appealed the Commission’s ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

 

 

We have two reportable segments, packaging and test. Packaging and test are integral steps in the process of manufacturing semiconductor devices, and our customers will engage with us for both packaging and test services, or just packaging or test services.

 

The accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as those for our Consolidated Financial Statements as a whole. We evaluate our operating segments based on gross profit and gross property, plant and equipment. We do not specifically identify and allocate total assets by operating segment. Summarized financial information concerning reportable segments is shown in the following table. The “other” column reflects other corporate adjustments to net sales and gross profit and the property, plant and equipment of our sales and corporate offices.

 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

As part of our ongoing efforts to improve our manufacturing operations and manage costs, we regularly evaluate our staffing levels and facility requirements compared to business needs. The following table summarizes our exit activities and reduction in force initiatives associated with these activities. “Charges” represents the initial charge related to the exit activity. “Cash Payments” consists of the utilization of “Charges.” “Non-cash Amounts” for the six months ended June 30, 2010, consists of asset impairments.